Skip to content

Biofortified

Stronger Plants, Stronger Science, and Stronger Communication

  • Home
  • About
    • About Biofortified
    • Meet our Experts
    • About Frank N. Foode™
  • Contact
    • Contact Biofortified
    • Join Our Mailing List
    • Biofortified Opportunities
  • Biofortified Blog
    • All Posts
    • Comment Policy
    • Write for the Biofortified Blog
  • Resources
    • Plant Plushies™
    • Biotech Companies
    • Biotech Traits
    • Calendar of Food and Ag Events
  • GENERA
    • GENERA Home
    • History of GENERA
    • GENERA FAQ
    • GMO studies with independent funding
    • Evaluating Bias
    • GMO Risks
    • Submit a Study
  • Support Us
  • Toggle search form

Concerns over change of tack by USDA on GM policy

Posted on December 28, 2010 By 1 Comment on Concerns over change of tack by USDA on GM policy

USDA may ‘deviate’ on GM policy
BY JACQUI FATKA
28 Dec, 2010 08:53 AM via Stock and Land

THE U.S. Department of Agriculture is entering uncharted waters with its proposed conditional deregulation of genetically modified (GM) alfalfa…

After USDA issued its environmental impact statement on Roundup Ready alfalfa, Agriculture Secretary Tom Vilsack called for producers of GM, non-GM and organic crops to coexist and scheduled a stakeholder meeting for Dec. 20.

After the private meeting conducted by Vilsack and USDA deputy secretary Kathleen Merrigan, many industry players left concerned about the direction USDA is taking in implementing a court order while not once mentioning the health or safety aspects of Roundup Ready alfalfa during the more-than-three-hour meeting.

Rosemarie Watkins, director of international policy at the American Farm Bureau Federation, said there is a “very real concern about where the department may be going with this in regard to coexistence and, perhaps, favoring one method of farming. When you start throwing in all these other things, including consumer preferences, you’re really starting to deviate from what has been the mainstay of our biotech approval policy.”

…more at link

Share this:

  • Share on X (Opens in new window) X
  • Share on Facebook (Opens in new window) Facebook

Like this:

Like Loading…

Related

Syndicated Tags:biofortified, Policy analysis, Politics and Policy, Stakeholder disagreements

Post navigation

Previous Post: Views on Science in High Places
Next Post: Co-existence isn’t easy

Related Posts

Look Beyond the Scientific Veneer of that GMO Report Syndicated
Views on Science in High Places Syndicated
Q&A with Okanagan Specialty Fruits’ president Neal Carter Science
When Being Good Frees Us to Be Bad Syndicated
Investment matters when it comes to gains in economic productivity over time – even in the cornfield. Syndicated
Real progress on EU E. coli outbreak: An Egyptian fenugreek seed source to European food disaster? Syndicated

Comment (1) on “Concerns over change of tack by USDA on GM policy”

  1. Eric Baumholder says:
    December 28, 2010 at 5:07 pm

    All that’s required for the success of the organic movement is its ability to portray itself as adhering to the model of ‘Old McDonald’, who had a farm.

    Urbanites with a penchant for nursery rhymes will have been indoctrinated in this model since infancy. In light of that, it may be time to upgrade the Old McDonald story. Old McDonald’s farm would have migrant laborers in the fields, and wild-eyed activists in the streets…

    Loading...
    Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Copyright © 2026 Biofortified.

Powered by PressBook Masonry Dark

%d