Skip to content

Biofortified

Stronger Plants, Stronger Science, and Stronger Communication

  • Home
  • About
    • About Biofortified
    • Meet our Experts
    • About Frank N. Foode™
  • Contact
    • Contact Biofortified
    • Join Our Mailing List
    • Biofortified Opportunities
  • Biofortified Blog
    • All Posts
    • Comment Policy
    • Write for the Biofortified Blog
  • Resources
    • Plant Plushies™
    • Biotech Companies
    • Biotech Traits
    • Calendar of Food and Ag Events
  • GENERA
    • GENERA Home
    • History of GENERA
    • GENERA FAQ
    • GMO studies with independent funding
    • Evaluating Bias
    • GMO Risks
    • Submit a Study
  • Support Us
  • Toggle search form

After the flood

Posted on June 18, 2008 By Anastasia Bodnar 4 Comments on After the flood

As flood waters are receding or moving downriver, I have been wondering what is in the water. The health and environmental risks now faced by the flooded areas and beyond were ignored for a while, but seem to be coming out – notedly in a few AP and NPR stories. The CDC has an entire website devoted to health after a flood. The flooding all over Iowa is extensively covered by the Des Moines Register, but the one article on health issues is severely lacking, focusing on injuries instead of infection. Many ignore the environmental consequences.
Fecal bacteria from manure lagoons and sewers will reside in mud left behind by the floodwaters. People cleaning up debris are at risk of tetanus and other infections in scrapes and scratches. Residual water will be a breeding ground for mosquitoes that may carry West Nile and other viruses. And, of course, the mold will grow.
Topsoil has been washed away. Pre-emergent herbicides may have effects from from their intended fields. Nitrogen from fertilized fields and animal waste will flow downstream, likely not causing problems until reaching the Gulf (this has been covered by some news outlets but is typiclly and incorrectly blamed on ethanol, more on that in another post).
All this on top of the structural damage and destruction of public and private property…
I’m upset about my own field – but am thankful that this is the only way I’ve been affected by the floods.

Share this:

  • Share on X (Opens in new window) X
  • Share on Facebook (Opens in new window) Facebook

Like this:

Like Loading…

Related

Science Tags:Environment

Post navigation

Previous Post: Clearing up some jargon
Next Post: Labels

Related Posts

The US government is at it again! Science
Flu shots from caterpillars Science
GM soybeans giving you a healthy heart and arteries and making you brainy. Science
The world’s smallest fly is a Phorid! Science
Fructose Science
GMO Food Is Actually Already Labeled If You Know A Few Rules Science

Comments (4) on “After the flood”

  1. Inoculated Mind says:
    June 19, 2008 at 5:13 am

    I just heard there’s a town of 600 people in Wisconsin that will be voting on whether or not to move their town – to a hill.

    Loading...
  2. Anastasia says:
    June 19, 2008 at 3:39 pm

    Wow. I wonder if it would be worth it to move?

    I did find one article over on Grist that looked at the environmental and health consequences of the flood. http://gristmill.grist.org/story/2008/6/16/161928/494“ rel=”nofollow”>After the deluge, by Tom Philpott. I don’t normally like his “reporting” style, but this article seems to be well researched.

    Loading...
  3. Iowa Floods says:
    February 17, 2009 at 10:28 pm

    Loved your insight!! For once someone got everything correct!! Would you mind if I put a blogroll link back to your post? 🙂

    Loading...
  4. Anastasia says:
    February 22, 2009 at 10:13 pm

    Thanks, Iowa Floods. Feel free to link back. You can blame the US Army for my ability to see some of the things other sites were missing – I was a sort of health inspector for them for a few years.

    Loading...

Comments are closed.

Copyright © 2026 Biofortified.

Powered by PressBook Masonry Dark

%d