Skip to content

Biofortified

Stronger Plants, Stronger Science, and Stronger Communication

  • Home
  • About
    • About Biofortified
    • Meet our Experts
    • About Frank N. Foode™
  • Contact
    • Contact Biofortified
    • Join Our Mailing List
    • Biofortified Opportunities
  • Biofortified Blog
    • All Posts
    • Comment Policy
    • Write for the Biofortified Blog
  • Resources
    • Plant Plushies™
    • Biotech Companies
    • Biotech Traits
    • Calendar of Food and Ag Events
  • GENERA
    • GENERA Home
    • History of GENERA
    • GENERA FAQ
    • GMO studies with independent funding
    • Evaluating Bias
    • GMO Risks
    • Submit a Study
  • Support Us
  • Toggle search form

GMOs on the Huffington Post

Posted on August 8, 2012 By Karl Haro von Mogel 15 Comments on GMOs on the Huffington Post

I know what you are thinking, but prepare to be surprised. While The Huffington Post has been a joke when it comes to science content on their blogs, there has been some good stuff coming out of their science news section. Our own Kevin Folta has been interviewed for the “Talk Nerdy to Me” series on the Huffington Post Science page. Cara Santa Maria talked to him about genetically engineered crops, and issues related to it. Have a look and watch Genetically Modified Food: ‘The Controversy is Really Curious to Scientists”!
http://pshared.5min.com/Scripts/PlayerSeed.js?sid=203&width=560&height=345&shuffle=0&playList=517426274

“I look at the scientists around me and the scientists I know, and you look at the anti-GMO activists. And we agree with them on just about every issue: we care about the environment, or we’re into worker safety, we want to feed more people better nutritious food, we want to have sustainable ways to grow food, but we differ on this one area.”

Feel free to comment here, or join the discussion over on the Huffington Post. Kevin has been quite active with responses!

Share this:

  • Share on X (Opens in new window) X
  • Share on Facebook (Opens in new window) Facebook

Like this:

Like Loading…

Related

Talks & Interviews Tags:anti-GMO, Environment, Genetic Engineering, genetic modification, GMO, Media, science

Post navigation

Previous Post: Seeds for Change: The Need for Stress Tolerant Crops in Central America
Next Post: The roles of ‘rationality’, ‘toxicity’ and ‘partisanship’ in interpreting scientific information

Related Posts

Edible Education 101 and GMOs Talks & Interviews
Q&A with Okanagan Specialty Fruits’ president Neal Carter Science
Bobbing for non-browning Arctic® Apples Talks & Interviews
Q&A about Plenish® soybeans Talks & Interviews
Better Know a Scientist: Entomologist Amelia Jordan Talks & Interviews
Interview with Margaret Mellon at MOSES Talks & Interviews

Comments (15) on “GMOs on the Huffington Post”

  1. MaryM says:
    August 8, 2012 at 12:16 pm

    Oh, man, the comments there. Personal favorite: “HP [Huffington Post] is on the take from Monsanto.”
    Conspiracy knows no bounds. I can’t stop laughing.

    Loading...
    Reply
  2. Kevin Folta says:
    August 8, 2012 at 12:23 pm

    For me, kudos to Cara Santa Maria. She’s exactly what Huff Po needs, she’s what science needs. She’s young, brilliant, sharp, and cool– the face I’d like attached to science.
    The interview with her is greatly edited. Our discussion was really good, she prepared well and we discussed the pros and cons evenly and fairly. I was really impressed with her depth of knowledge on the topic.
    So long gone are the days of HuffPo’s crap science. Maybe they have a winner here.

    Loading...
    Reply
  3. Ewan R says:
    August 8, 2012 at 2:06 pm

    I dunno if I have the energy frankly.
    Some guy linked the same stupid piece 4+ times and then gets upset that in the 250 word reply limit I “only” discredited 3 of them. Despite my debunking of a lot more of it elsewhere.
    Why must someone always be wrong on the internet?
    I doubt that this heralds the death of HuffPo’s crap science however, any large dataset will have its outliers.

    Loading...
    Reply
  4. DebbieC says:
    August 8, 2012 at 5:30 pm

    One of my favorite comments: “Flavr Savr tomato by Calgene is genetically altered and I became allergic to tomatoes due the genetic alteration. Newly genetically altered foods with latex genes for shipping such as nectarines, banana, zucchini,celery kiki, and cherries. I have a latex allergy and this does not help.”
    Will HuffPo be doing a follow-up interview? Their editing left the idea that superweeds are a problem only with GMO crops, and that much more pesticide is being used as well.

    Loading...
    Reply
    1. Ewan R says:
      August 8, 2012 at 5:38 pm

      I would have enjoyed that if it werent for the foot in mouth syndrome I developed in the next comment re: the commercialization of Flavr Savr.. oops!

      Loading...
      Reply
      1. DebbieC says:
        August 8, 2012 at 8:43 pm

        Whether Flavr Savr failed or not – it doesn’t exist so the guy blaming his allergies on it is nuts.
        Reading the comments is kind of depressing. Poor scientists: if you don’t talk to the public, you’re doing evil secret things and if you do talk to the public, you’re still doing evil secret things.

        Loading...
      2. Ewan R says:
        August 9, 2012 at 7:53 am

        The fact the Flavr Savr did exist however leaves the door open slightly if you believe in totally absurd science (like the folk claiming the body reads all the metabolites and the DNA in incoming food to make sure it is acceptable and not rare – which would be a rather impressive feat, we should probably be figuring out where the human body stores information on the genomes of everything we eat – it’d save a lot of money, I rather imagine Kevin would be overjoyed to get the human bodies read of the strawberry genome for instance, if only to check his work)

        Loading...
    2. Norm says:
      August 14, 2012 at 7:31 pm

      Latex genes in fruit? I missed that one.

      Loading...
      Reply
  5. Kevin Folta says:
    August 12, 2012 at 5:30 am

    It is sad because I do make an honest effort to use the HuffPo piece as a teachable vehicle. Comments from angry posters hiding behind fake names are boring, and I’m helpless against them. They have more time on their hands than I do and they can make shit up when I can’t!
    So yesterday I didn’t even look at it. Spend a 16 hour Saturday in the lab and figured out something really cool. The best part is, it will change a product that everyone consumes. It is not transgenic, but it is sure different! My guess is that it will be marketed, the organic markets will love it, and there never will be any testing on animals or people. People will eat it, like it, and never complain.

    Loading...
    Reply
    1. Rachael Ludwick says:
      August 12, 2012 at 9:10 pm

      I don’t know what to do about the dis-informing hordes. Since so much of what people learn these days is online, I feel like online comments are actually important. But there’s only so much time and frankly it gets boring. “Oh, great, they referenced that one crappy paper again”.
      But thanks for being out there. The commenters aren’t the only ones watching and reading so hopefully the silent majority learned something.

      Loading...
      Reply
  6. dave says:
    August 12, 2012 at 11:24 pm

    Total propaganda nonsense.
    The INDEPENDENT studies of GM crops have linked them to a range of health problems: obesity, infertility, organ damage, etc.
    So much other misinformation in this piece, I’m uninterested in addressing it all.

    Loading...
    Reply
    1. Karl Haro von Mogel says:
      August 14, 2012 at 9:37 am

      Dave,
      Studies have not linked genetically engineered crops to the maladies that you list. In fact, we have a list of over 100 independent studies that show the exact opposite. You are referring to fringe studies that not only have methodological problems, but have been exaggerated to represent more than they actually do. And some are funded by anti-biotech organizations like Greenpeace, so I wouldn’t really count those as independent and unbiased. Keep that in mind when you accuse others of propaganda.

      Loading...
      Reply
    2. Ewan R says:
      August 14, 2012 at 10:45 am

      A compelling arguement, full of well backed citations, logical consideration of the topic and well thought out conclusions. I congratulate you on a thesis which has likely altered the course of production agriculture for the forseeable future.

      Loading...
      Reply
    3. MaryM says:
      August 14, 2012 at 8:26 pm

      McKayla is uninterested in your disinterest. http://screencast.com/t/Ro6FWi08Eelc

      Loading...
      Reply
  7. DebbieC says:
    August 16, 2012 at 2:03 pm

    Latex genes (or proteins?) are naturally occurring in a lot of foods, correct? I have an allergy to latex and cannot eat bananas, avocados, kiwis without tingly, itchiness around the mouth and throat. Was surprised to see a rather long list of potentially offending foods on a latex allergy website (carrots, potatoes, barley, among others).

    Loading...
    Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Copyright © 2026 Biofortified.

Powered by PressBook Masonry Dark

%d