Natural GMOs Part 81. Thorough genetic characterisation of a naturally transgenic grass plant variety.

GMOs are often defined as events that cannot occur in nature.

GMO Pundit’s series on natural GMOs has provided many examples of movement of DNA between different species, indeed different biological kingdoms that are found in the natural world. Click on the natural GMOs tag to find these examples.

This new paper by Pernilla Vallenback and co-authors for which there is open Internet access, provides a thorough characterisation of an example where a gene segment has moved between two different types of grass species that are reproductively isolated in nature.

Preliminary information about this event has appeared in the literature before this time, but the new paper provides a thorough characterisation of the nature of the genes near the natural transgene. The authors do not have any clear idea of how the event occurred but the evidence in the paper shows that it does occur, and as a mobile gene related gene segment appears near the natural  transgene, quite likely it was involved in some way in the movement of DNA between two different species.

The authors talk about a vector for the DNA movement, which might be a virus, or might be some other agency such as a parasitic insect that injects plant cells with material as part of its life cycle.

Because its review section at the start contains an excellent introduction to the scientific literature on the topic of horizontal gene movement or lateral gene movement between different species, the complete paper has been provided below.

It shows that the legal basis for regulating laboratory-based genetic events on the assumption that they cannot occur in nature means that has been thoroughly undermined by scientific proof that transgenes are natural.

But first, an update:

GMOs and Mother Nature? Closer Than You Think
When it comes to genetically modified organisms (GMOs), one criticism stands above the others: its unnatural.  The idea that (unlike conventional genetic exchange within a species) genes from one species can be transferred to another fuels this perception of unnaturalness. The UKs Health and Safety Executive, a watchdog group for worker health, explains that genetic modification occurs when the genetic material of an organism (either DNA or RNA) is altered by use of a method that does not occur in nature.  The anti-biotech Non-GMO Project notes that genetic modification creates combinations of plant, animal, bacteria, and viral genes that do not occur in nature. The Huffington Post plugged last October as non-GMO month on the grounds that genetic modification produces goods through processes that do not occur in nature.  Greenpeace has described breaching species barriers as unnatural. Daily Kos insists that gene splicing does not occur in nature.  In a word: frankenfood.
Well, you know where this is going.  Scientists have now confirmed what evolutionary geneticists have long suspected  nature does produce GMOs.  Swedish researchers discovered an enzyme-producing gene in a meadow grass that naturally crossed into sheeps fescue about 700,000 years ago.  The most plausible explanation, said Professor Bengt O. Bengtsson of Lund University, is that the gene was transmitted by a parasite or pathogen, such as a virus, perhaps with the help of a sap-sucking insect. The fact that cross-species gene transfer happens without human intervention in nature, however rare, provides further justification for viewing transgenic technology not as a Frankensteinian intervention into the natural world, but as yet another method of trait selection, something weve been doing with heroic results since the dawn of agriculture…Quote ends

Structure of the Natural Transgene PgiC2 in the Common Grass Festuca ovina

Pernilla Vallenback*Lena GhatnekarBengt O. Bengtsson
Department of Biology, Genetics, Lund University, Lund, Sweden

Abstract Top


A horizontal gene transfer has brought an active nuclear gene,PgiC2, from a polyploid Poa species (P. palustris or a close relative) into the common grass sheep’s fescue (Festuca ovina). The donor and the receptor species are strictly reproductively separated, and PgiC2 occurs in a polymorphic state within F. ovina. The active gene copy is normally closely linked to a very similar pseudogene.

Methodology/Principal Findings

By genome walking we have obtained the up- and downstream sequences of PgiC2 and of corresponding genes in the donor and recipient species. Comparisons of these sequences show that the complete upstream region necessary for the gene’s expression is included in the transferred segment. About 1 kb upstream of PgiC2 a fragment with transposition associated properties has been found (TAF). It is present in P. palustris and its polyploid relatives, though not at the homologous position, and is absent from many other grasses, including non-transgenic F. ovina plants. It is possible that it is a part of a transposing element involved in getting the gene into a transferring agent and/or into the recipient chromosome.


The close similarity of the up- and downstream regions with the corresponding regions in P. palustris excludes all suggestions that PgiC2 is not a HGT but the result of a duplication within theF. ovina lineage. The small size of the genetic material transferred, the complex nature of the PgiC2locus, and the associated fragment with transposition associated properties suggest that the horizontal transfer occurred via a vector and not via illegitimate pollination.

Introduction Top

Horizontal gene transfer, HGT, can be defined as transfer of genetic material between distantly related genomes by some mechanism other than sexual fertilization. Originally believed to be very rare or non-existent in higher plants, mitochondrial gene transfers involving several species have now been reported [1]. Recently, it has been claimed that nuclear DNA transfer can also occur [2][4]. Some species participating in HGT have a symbiotic relationship [5][6], and genes have been recorded to transfer from host to parasite as well as from parasite to host [5][6], but such coevolutionary associations do not seem to be obligatory. One of the known nuclear transfers consists of a transposing element [2], but in no case has the exact mechanism underlying a horizontal gene transfer in plants been fully elucidated.
Two major hypotheses exist for how a horizontal gene transfer in higher plants can take place. The first suggests that genetic material is introgressed into a different genetic background after a pollination event between two species. Since by definition the genomes of the two species must be distantly related, such a deviant pollination may not lead to a regular fertilization and may entail disturbances such as chromosome fragmentation [7]. Using wide crosses in combination with embryo rescue and other laboratory technologies, researchers in plant breeding have succeeded in transferring chromosomes, chromosome arms, or parts of chromosomes between species and/or genera [see, for example, 8]. Whether such processes occur in nature is, however, uncertain. If they occur, they would probably involve large chromosome segments and more than single genes, just as in artificial crosses.
The second hypothesis suggests that the genetic material is transferred into the new species by a vector. Viruses, bacteria and insects have been suggested as possible vectors with abilities to transfer small DNA fragments. This hypothesis still requires that the transferred fragment ultimately becomes incorporated into a host chromosome. Transposable elements may be involved in the excision of the gene, as well as in its integration into the host chromosome.
We have previously described a horizontal transfer of a functional nuclear gene, designated PgiC2, between two grass species [3][4]. The process has moved the gene from a polyploid Poa species (P. palustris is a likely candidate) into the very common diploid grass sheep’s fescue, Festuca ovina [3][4],[9]. No natural hybrids have ever been found between these widespread and species-rich genera[10][11]. The transgene is not fixed in F. ovina but is carried by many individuals and reach, for example, a frequency of 6.2% for chromosomes sampled in the south Baltic region [9]. By combined genetic and sequence analysis it has been shown that active PgiC2 genes found in F. ovina are normally closely genetically linked to a very similar pseudogene [12][3]. However, a single plant has been found with two closely linked active PgiC2 genes (of allelic forms b and c) and no pseudogenes, and many plants have no active copies of PgiC2 but only pseudogenes at the locus [12][9]. These variants probably arose by unequal crossovers between chromosomes with the standard configuration of one active gene closely linked to one pseudogene.
The F. ovina genome is large, with a 1C DNA content of 4.75 pg [15] or roughly 4.4 billion bp, which makes a strategy of constructing and scanning a BAC-library for the study of the molecular structure ofPgiC2 both time-consuming and costly. We therefore choose to base our characterization of PgiC2 in F. ovina on genome walks out of the gene. The technique is sensitive and error prone, and its application to the present problem is complicated by the fact that the transgenic F. ovina plants contain many copies of different PgiC-genes. However, by carefully rechecking the results, we have assembled well-ascertained sequences up- and downstream of PgiC2, as well as of other PgiC genes, that lead to a first detailed description of the structure of this unique transgene.

Results Top

By genome walking we determined the complete sequence of the F. ovina PgiC2 gene. In addition, 1337 bp upstream and 604 bp downstream of the gene were identified. Fig. 1 shows the upstream part of the gene, divided into regions with varying degrees of sequence similarity relative to other PgiCsequences.

Figure 1. The upstream sequence of PgiC2, drawn to scale, with boundaries identified by sequence comparisons with other PgiC genes.
The Transgene Associated Fragment (TAF) is marked, and the positions of the primers used for its amplification are shown. The results given in Table 1 are coded as follows: Red denotes sequence similarity with all types ofPgiC-genes. Orange denotes similarity between PgiC2 and PgiC in P. palustris. Green denotes similarity between the two tested plants with PgiC2 with no similarity to any of the other plants.


Comparison between PgiC2 and Other PgiC Sequences

With the same method we obtained 1844 bp upstream sequence of the F. ovina PgiC1 gene. Table 1shows the numbers of differences from PgiC2. No sequence similarity between PgiC2 and PgiC1 could be recognized beyond 666 bp upstream of exon 1. This point defines the boundary between regions I and II in Fig. 1 and Table 1. Within region I the difference between PgiC1 and PgiC2 increased with increasing distance from the start codon.

Table 1. The difference between PgiC2 and other sequences over the upstream regions described in Fig. 1.


From Poa palustris 2169 bp upstream of the PgiC gene were obtained. This sequence was highly similar to the sequence from PgiC2 (see Table 1), until the similarity abruptly ended at bp 775. This point we take to delimit regions II and III in Fig. 1 and Table 1. No further similarity between the upstream sequences was detected beyond this point.
From the F. ovina bc plant, carrying the rare version of PgiC2 with two active alleles, 1305 bp of the upstream sequence was obtained. Very high similarity was found between this sequence and the sequence from the plant with the standard configuration of PgiC2 (see Table 1).

The Transgene Associated Fragment (TAF) and its distribution

Within upstream region III a pair of PCR primers (see Fig. 1) amplified a 145 bp long fragment in the two investigated plants with PgiC2 genes. A similar band was obtained from the P. palustris plant, while the F. ovina plant without PgiC2 did not produce any band. We call this the Transgene Associated Fragment (TAF).
This PCR reaction was also run on 22 F. ovina plants from different populations in the south Baltic region, of which eleven contained the PgiC2 locus and eleven did not. A band of expected length was obtained from all F. ovina plants with PgiC2, whereas the plants without PgiC2 did not produce any TAF band. Some of the plants with PgiC2 had only pseudogenes and no active genes.
To further investigate the distribution of TAF, plants from 14 different grass species were tested with PCR (P. angustifoliaP. nemoralisP. compressaP. chaixiiP. supinaP. annuaF. pratensisF. arundinaceaF. polesicaLolium perenneDactylis glomerataZea maysOryza sativa and Hordeum vulgare). Bands of the expected length were obtained from the three polyploid Poa species (angustifolianemoralis and compressa) but not from any of the other species.
A genome walk in the PgiC2 plant, starting in TAF and moving away from the gene, resulted in one sequence that was identical to the well-ascertained upstream sequence until base pair 1174. Outside this point a different unique sequence was found. This is the end of region III in Fig. 1 and Table 1.

Sequence information from downstream PgiC2

Downstream of the PgiC2 gene the sequence was very similar to the corresponding sequence fromPgiC in P. palustris. In 613 base pairs, 15 single base pair substitutions or indels were found plus 12 base pair differences or indels that involved more than one consecutive nucleotide. A comparison with the downstream sequence of PgiC1 in F. ovina gave, however, a completely different result. Here the homology between PgiC1 and PgiC2 (and PgiC from P. palustris) ended immediately downstream the stop codon of the gene.

Discussion Top

The PgiC2 locus in F. ovina was originally detected through the presence of too many bands in an isozyme survey [14]. This implies that elements necessary for the expression of PgiC2, typically placed upstream of a gene, must have been brought along with it. The sequences of PgiC2 and PgiC1 from F. ovina and PgiC from P. palustris are all similar in region I, though PgiC1 becomes increasingly divergent with increasing distance from the gene. This similarity ends at the boundary to region II, when PgiC1becomes different from the other sequences, thereby presumably marking the end of the upstream region necessary for regular gene expression.
The similarity between PgiC2 and PgiC in P. palustris extends beyond this point, and includes region II in Fig. 1. This implies that the transfer of genetic material from P. palustris into F. ovina involved a chromosome fragment that most likely contained not only a structural gene but also its necessary controlling sequences. If PgiC1 and PgiC from P. palustris were similar beyond the region of homology with PgiC2, then the apparently normal regulation of PgiC2 expression would need its own separate explanation.
The differences and similarities of these three sequences in the up- and downstream regions give renewed support to and – we would claim – finally prove our earlier conclusion that PgiC2 in F.ovina is the result of a horizontal transfer from Poa [3][4]. The close similarity in upstream regions betweenPgiC2 in F. ovina and PgiC in the distantly related species P. palustris, can only be explained by a very recent common history. No evolutionary scenario, involving any kind of stabilizing or directional selection, could lead to the pattern shown in Table 1 and Figure 1 if PgiC2 were a duplication of thePgiC1 gene within the F. ovina lineage. This conclusion is strongly confirmed by the downstream data. The sequence downstream the PgiC2 gene is highly similar to the corresponding sequence from P. palustris for hundreds of base pairs, while no sequence similarity exists relative to PgiC1. Given the complete reproductive separation between the Festuca and Poa genera [10][11], and the extensive sequence divergence found between these genera with respect to their standard PgiC genes [4] as well as their ITS sequences [12][13]PgiC2 undoubtedly represents a case of a horizontal gene transfer, and – as yet – the only example involving a functional nuclear gene among angiosperms [16],[17].
With respect to the question of how this horizontal gene transfer came about, we know as yet too little, but the results from our analysis of the transgene characteristic fragment, TAF, in upstream region III are suggestive. When the end of similarity between the upstream regions of PgiC2 and PgiCfrom P. palustris was found, it seemed reasonable that we had detected the end of the horizontally transferred region and that the “standard” DNA of F. ovina “returned” here. To check this suggestion we constructed primers that would amplify only this fragment. However, when targeting these primers to non-transgenic F. ovina plants no amplification was detected. Such amplification was only obtained in plants already known to contain the transgenic PgiC2 gene. From this we conclude that region III inFig.1 does not correspond to any region in the standard F.ovina genome, but must have been brought into this species by the HGT event. In correspondence with this conclusion, the sequence can be found in polyploid Poa species.
The TAF sequence has properties associated with transposing elements. As reported above, from thePgiC2 plant we also obtained a sequence with one end as in TAF and region III but with a completely difference sequence at its upstream end. This result can be taken to imply that TAF exists in more than one copy within the horizontally transferred fragment. It is also notable that TAF resides in P. palustrisin a different position(s) than immediately upstream PgiC, since no trace of it could be detected in the 1844 bp upstream region. Among different grasses, TAF was found in the closely related group of polyploids from which we have earlier shown that PgiC2 must be derived [4], but not in any of the other tested species. Taken together these data indicate that TAF represents DNA of a mobile nature and that it may have played a role in the HGT process. Further cloning studies to determine the genomic contexts in which TAF are found in different grasses will, thus, be important, as will investigations of its sequence variation (that may cause PCR based methods to fail to detect its presence).
Of the two suggested modes by which horizontal gene transfers may occur – non-standard pollination and vector mediation – we cannot formally exclude the first possibility. We failed, however, to detect any chromosome fragment from P. palustris in F. ovina plants with PgiC2 in preliminary experiments with GISH [18], which – if found – would have supported the first alternative. Instead, the small upstream size of the transferred segment (as judged from the comparison with P. palustris), the duplication of the PgiC2 gene at or just after its insertion into a F. ovina chromosome (as judged from the similarity between the active and the pseudogene versions of PgiC2), plus the fact that it is closely associated with a sequence with transposing characteristics, make us prefer the alternative suggestion that PgiC2has been transferred to F. ovina by a vector of so-far unknown kind.

Materials and Methods Top

Plant Material, Genome Walking and Sequence Analysis

Sequences of PgiC2 were obtained from two plants belonging to Festuca ovina L. The first had genotype PgiC1 d/d PgiC2 cφc/0, the second PgiC1 d/d PgiC2 bc/0. The sequence of PgiC1 was obtained from a F. ovina plant with genotype PgiC1 d/d PgiC2 0/0. These three plants have earlier been used for descriptions of the PgiC1and PgiC2 genes and for sequence comparisons [4]. The sequence of PgiC inPoa palustris was based on the same plant as used for an earlier sequence comparison [4].
DNA was extracted using Plant-Mini kit from Qiagen. Genome walking was performed using the Genome walking kit from Sigma-Aldrich according to the suggested protocol in the kit manual. DNA was digested using standard digestion protocols for restriction enzymes. PCR products were ligated into pGEM-T Easy vectors (Promega) and transformed into JM109 Competent cells from Promega. Ampicillin was used for selection. The colonies were used in a PCR reaction with universal primers SP6 and T7. The PCR products were purified and sequenced by Macrogen.
Whenever a new presumptive sequence was obtained, primers were constructed based on the new sequence information and used with a primer inside the well-corroborated sequence in order to validate the result. This was particularly important when the new region was suspected to contain transposable elements. Sequences were aligned and analysed using Sequencher version 4.7. Position numbers were determined from consensus sequences. The up- and downstream sequences of PgiC2,PgiC1 and of PgiC from P. palustris have been deposited in GenBank (accession no. xx-xx).
The PgiC2 locus is obviously complex. The plant used as our reference has at least one active gene and one very closely linked pseudogene between which strong sequence similarity holds. With respect to the upstream sequences reported on here, we take them to represent the sequences upstream of both of these genes, since no difference was found between PCR runs with primers specific for the active and the inactive genes. The crucial difference between these genes is instead found in a deletion affecting the boundary between intron 12 and exon 13 [3].
Analysis of the Transgene Associated Fragment (TAF).
To test for the presence of the TAF region, DNA from P. angustifoliaP. nemoralisP. compressaP. chaixiiP. supinaP. annuaL. perennesF. pratensisF. arundinaceaF. polesicaDactylis glomerataZea maysOryza sativa and Hordeum vulgarewere obtained from the same plants as used in our earlier sequence comparisons [3][4]. For the same purpose additional F. ovina plants were taken from the earlier analysed population samples [4](1 to 4 individuals with and without PgiC2 from Bornholm, Haget, Eketorp, Mosty and Dresden). The PCR screening was performed using standard method with the TAF primers (xxx) and (xxx).

Acknowledgments Top

We thank Bengt Jacobsson for taking good care of the plants, Pernilla Andersson and Arnulf Merker (†) for cooperative work using GISH, and Alf Ceplitis, Maarit Jaarola, and Torbjörn Säll for encouraging discussions and helpful comments.

Author Contributions Top

Conceived and designed the experiments: PV LG. Performed the experiments: PV. Analyzed the data: PV BOB. Contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools: PV LG. Wrote the paper: PV BOB.

References Top

  1. Bergthorsson U, Adams KL, Thomason B, Palmer JD (2003) Widespread horizontal transfer of mitochondrial genes in flowering plants. Nature 424: 197–201. FIND THIS ARTICLE ONLINE
  2. Diao X, Freeling M, Lisch DR (2006) Horizontal transfer of a plant transposon. PLoS Biol 4: 119–128. FIND THIS ARTICLE ONLINE
  3. Ghatnekar L, Jaarola M, Bengtsson BO (2006) The introgression of a functional nuclear gene fromPoa to Festuca ovina. Proc R Soc Ser B 273: 395–399. FIND THIS ARTICLE ONLINE
  4. Vallenback P, Jaarola M, Ghatnekar L, Bengtsson BO (2008) Origin and timing of the horizontal transfer of a PgiC gene from Poa to Festuca ovina. Mol Phylogenet Evol 46: 890–896. FIND THIS ARTICLE ONLINE
  5. Davis CC, Wurdack KJ (2004) Host-to-parasite gene transfer in flowering plants: Phylogenetic evidence from Malpighiales. Science 305: 676–678. FIND THIS ARTICLE ONLINE
  6. Davis CC, Anderson WR, Wurdack KJ (2005) Gene transfer from a parasitic flowering plant to a fern. Proc R Soc Ser B 272: 2237–2242. FIND THIS ARTICLE ONLINE
  7. Davies DR (1974) Chromosome elimination in inter-specific hybrids. Heredity 32: 267–270. FIND THIS ARTICLE ONLINE
  8. < li style="font-size: 1em; list-style-position: outside; margin-bottom: 0px; margin-left: 0px; margin-right: 0px; margin-top: 0px; padding-bottom: 5px; padding-left: 0px; padding-right: 0px; padding-top: 5px;" xpathlocation="noSelect">Laurie DA, O’Donoughue LS, Bennett MD (1990) Wheat × maize and other wide sexual hybrids: their potential for genetic manipulation and crop improvement. In: Gustafson JP, editor. Gene Manipulation in Plant Improvement II. New York: Plenum Press. pp. 95–126.

  9. Vallenback P, Bengtsson BO, Ghatnekar L (2010) Geographic and molecular variation in a natural plant transgene. Genetica 138: 355–362. FIND THIS ARTICLE ONLINE
  10. Knobloch IW (1968) A check list of crosses in the Gramineae (Michigan State University, East Lansing).
  11. Hegi G (1996) Illustrierte Flora von Mittel-Europa. Bd 1.T.3. Lief 8/9 (Parey, Berlin).
  12. Ghatnekar L (1999) A polymorphic duplicated locus for cytosolic PGI segregating in sheep’s fescue (Festuca ovina L.). Heredity 83: 451–459. FIND THIS ARTICLE ONLINE
  13. Grime JP, Mowforth MA (1982) Variation in genome size – an ecological interpretation. Nature 299: 151–153. FIND THIS ARTICLE ONLINE
  14. Gaut BS, Tredway LP, Kubik C, Gaut RL, Meyer W (2000) Phylogenetic relationships and genetic diversity among members of the Festuca-Lolium complex (Poaceae) based on ITS sequence data. Plant Syst Evol 224: 33–53. FIND THIS ARTICLE ONLINE
  15. Torrecilla P, Catalán P (2002) Phylogeny of broad-leaved and fine-leaved Festuca lineages (Poaceae) based on nuclear ITS sequences. Syst Bot 27: 241–251. FIND THIS ARTICLE ONLINE
  16. Richardson AO, Palmer JD (2007) Horizontal gene transfer in plants. J Exp Bot 58: 1–9. FIND THIS ARTICLE ONLINE
  17. Bock R (2010) The give-and-take of DNA: horizontal gene transfer in plants. Trends Plant Sci 15: 11–22. FIND THIS ARTICLE ONLINE
  18. Vallenback P (2009) Horizontal Gene Transfer in Plants – The Story of PgiC2 (Doctoral Thesis in Genetics, Lund University, Lund).
Syndicated , , ,